|
|
|
Presented for the |
|
Red Cedar Writing Project Homecoming Day, June
28, 2001 |
|
Nancy Patterson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The question is “How should we teach grammar?” |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compared two groups |
|
One studied traditional grammar; the other used
the time to work on extended pieces of writing. This group approached errors through meaning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meta-study that examined previous pieces of
research |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Studied 248 students in 8 classes over 3 years |
|
One group studied transformational grammar |
|
One group studied rhetoric and literature and
also creative writing with writing conventions and spelling as the need
arose |
|
Another group studied heavy doses of traditional
grammar. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another meta-study, commissioned by NCTE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Focused on adult basic writers |
|
Study looks at the cause of error in student
writing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar 1: The formal arrangement of words in
patterns that convey meaning |
|
Grammar 2: The descriptive analysis that
linguists engage in |
|
Grammar 3: “Linguistic Etiquette,” the rules of
correctness |
|
Grammar 4: School grammar, something Hartwell
warns bears little relationship to Grammar 2 |
|
|
|
|
Dialects of English are as rule-bound as the
dialect we refer to as Standard English |
|
Teachers need to understand the rules of the
dialects students in their rooms speak in order to help them code switch
back and forth between dialects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
That teachers focus on most frequent errors in
student writing |
|
These usually involve run-on sentences, comma
splices, fragments, and the boundaries between clauses |
|
They also include subject/verb agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skills lists where students keep track of their
errors |
|
Visual reminders in the form of posters or
banners |
|
Departmental agreements about which writing conventions students need to
focus on |
|
Focused, meaning-based writing invitations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|